It is devastating’: the way 30 captive beluga whales are being used as bargaining chips in conflict over animal cruelty.
Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an adorable little “playful character”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a sizeable but fiercely protective companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and sways like a worm. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.
A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canadian amusement park have been entangled in a tussle between a closed attraction, government authorities and welfare campaigners.
But those closest to the whales say the impassioned discussion over their fate often overlooks the nuances of the whales who, after growing up in captivity, have been closely studied by the people who work with them regularly.
After the federal government disallowed the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial amusement park near the famous falls where they are housed stated it would consider to end their lives unless the authorities covers the expense of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has denied that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an ever more uncertain circumstance.
Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures
Experts say that belugas’ neuroanatomy, along with their sound replication, problem solving and communal behavior suggest they are remarkably smart mammals – something a former trainer learned personally.
Burgess spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a job that involved earning the trust of the aquatic animals.
“Developing those bonds over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of love. At the beginning, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so wonderful and rewarding.”
The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nevertheless astounded by the subtleties and idiosyncrasies in their personalities. She formed a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with opposing natures.
“One whale accepted me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Both changed the way I perceive relationships.”
Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions
Her interaction with the whales evolved against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their enclosure.
During her time at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s single orca, Kiska, died. In total, nineteen belugas have died at the park since recent years, a toll which the facility ascribes to natural mortality, but which campaigners say points to the poor conditions in which they were housed.
The facility did not operate to the visitors over the recent season, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes consequences of the shutdown. “Concrete is deteriorating from the pools because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are exploratory and so they pick it up and navigate with fragments in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”
The facility did not comment to a inquiry, but previously claimed: “The whales … obtain far superior veterinary services and constant supervision than any person in the United Kingdom, or elsewhere.”
Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions
The former employee was terminated from the park in recent months following the passing of a beluga, an ailing beluga the employees had to humanely kill. She said the park suspected details of the incident were shared to the media and she was fired soon after.
The uncertainty over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and current and former trainers in despair. She says the park’s threat to kill its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” undertaking, adding any plans to put down even a individual beluga would require “considerable personnel”, vehicles and machinery.
“It’s impossible in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess advocates for requests for the whales to be removed promptly from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and shrinking team.
In the autumn, the nation’s government official denied a bid to export the whales to China.
“Allowing the application would have meant a ongoing existence in captivity and a return to performance for audiences,” the minister commented. “As Canadians, we know that belugas should be in the ocean, not in tanks for our amusement. I could not in clear conscience permit an relocation that would perpetuate the situation these belugas have suffered.”
But Burgess said the minister’s comments reflect a broader incorrect perception of the circumstances of living conditions for belugas raised in confinement.
“The society needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in confinement and they will need human care for the rest of their years,” she said. “People just don’t understand that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.”
Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion
As decision makers work to find a answer, ideas have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. An idea called for the belugas to be released into the wilds of Canada’s north – where whales are a key source of food for local populations.
A proposed refuge in the region of Nova Scotia, which recently received government approval, has been contentious. The planned location, which includes a large area of penned in ocean, doesn’t yet exist. Advocates remain optimistic that it could in time represent a long term solution for eight of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s consulted, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ future.
Different voices say the possibility of a sanctuary represents a changing attitudes away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a workable solution in the near future.
The project lead, head of the plan, said the site will mimic the mental engagement and nutrition the whales get from specialists, albeit in a more expansive area. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|